More Rejected Questions So Far

I got one or two questions rejected tonight. Almost many of my proposed questions were rejected for no reason.

Here’s a couple of my rejected questions so far.

I can’t really do anything other than speculate, but here’s my two cents on a few of the questions you included:

  • ID6496 - Is this question asking which form of griefing was common only in the early days of TF2, or a form of griefing currently in the game? Or are you asking which form of griefing, discovered/performed since the beginning of TF2, still remains in the game?
  • ID6499 - Seems incredibly specific to an individuals opinion and may be confusing to the reader to answer in a short amount of time (TU I think gives you 10 seconds?). You’re asking which year the YouTuber published his opinion on the “worst year” for animated films. I’m reading that as you’re asking which year this person posted his opinion but it could be mistaken that you’re asking which year he declared as the worst year for films.
  • ID7034 - I’m not too sure what’s being asked here (I’m also completely unfamiliar with brony culture). Is this question asking when the fandom jumped the shark about something that happened in the episode?
  • ID7989 - I’m not sure what this question is asking. Do actual virgins cry blood in Canada during a certain year? Is this a band that was established in a specific year?
  • ID7991 - this one seems OK, and the answer is something I can quickly find with a Google search.
  • ID6493 - is this question asking about an animated film that had a lawsuit as it’s story? Is this question asking about an animated film that plagiarized another film and was in a lawsuit?

Also - as an outside opinion for ID6488. I’m not sure what answers or sources were offered here, but from my memory cheating has always been allowed (potentially encouraged) through official Monopoly rules for the banker. I also am vaguely aware of a “cheaters version” of the game released within the last decade or so that you may be referencing instead. I’m not too sure if any of these games “introduce” the player to cheating but would instead inform players that cheating is allowed if you can get away with it (the specific cheaters version may be different, I’ve not played this version).

Hope you get some answers on the questions but figured I’d give you some feedback!

1 Like
  • ID6496: The whole adult sprays that we’re unpatched for a long time in Team Fortress 2 is when Valve never made original sprays for the game since the late-90s (and maybe early-2000s). But since custom sprays were allowed by mew users, a community server rules against adult imagery were inforced by community server moderators.
  • ID6499: 2013 is what AniMat stated as the “worst year” for animated films in his Top 5 Best and Worst Animated Films of 2013 video on YouTube.
  • ID7034: Magical Mystery Cure was the 13th episode of the third season when Twilight Sparkle has finally become an alicorn (a.k.a. princess).
  • ID7989: The only scene when the Virgin Mary statue crying blood in Canada came from a French Canadian episode of Génération 80 (aired on Musimax back ni 2003) about the highlights of 1986, hosted by Bruno Landry, a member of Rock et Belles Oreilles. The only thing that I completely missed out while making this question (before rejection) is when someone literally applying pig’s blood to all statues. The scene was located inside the chruch at Saint-Marthe-sur-le-Lac.
  • ID7991: Jean-Yves Raimbaud was my true answer as the creator of Oggy and the Cockroaches before rejection.
  • ID6493: The suit references similarities between Disney’s film and Goldman’s Zootopia, including themes, settings, the ensemble (down to individual characters) and even dialogue. Yes, Disney’s Zootopia is facing a lawsuit.
  • ID6488: Monopoly: Cheaters Edition is a new edition of the game. Players can follow, bend, or break the rules to win. They can try to get away with as many cheats as possible. Cheat cards tell players which cheats to attempt.
1 Like

I think the reason why these questions were rejected were either because they were too vague / opinionated or the way they were written would be difficult to understand for a native English speaker.

I read your explanations for the answers that you posted above.
I would argue that ID6496, ID7034, and ID6495 are too vague / opinionated as they are to have a single answer (many unpatched griefing methods in TF2, fandom related things could be subjective, what scam in particular?)
ID6493, ID6488, and ID7989 could be reworded to make them more comprehensible. For example, “What animated film plagiarized a controversial Oscar-nominated lawsuit?” could be “Disney was accused of plagiarizing a screenplay for the story, themes, design, and name for which of their animated films?”

ID7991 seems fine. ID6492 might just need doublechecking. ID6489 also looks fine if all that is missing is punctuation.

1 Like