Ad Updated Movers Request

Upon returning to building my theme park, I would like to redo my previous request with a few additions. I will be as detailed as possible. Mac just DM me if anything’s unclear.

My requests to be coded into movers:

1: ApproachSpinRateDuration

Just like how duration works for the normal movers, where if you put “Move to: Y: 500”, it’s speed will be determined by the duration setting. If duration it 5, it takes 5 seconds for it to move those 500 units, 30 it takes 30 seconds and moves slower overall.

I would like this same logic applied to the existing ApproachSpin feature. Right now it’s fast, and only really helpful for making starting or stopping a slow spin less jarring.

Currently, getting a smooth, crisp wind up to a spin requires in I:O ApproachSpinRate to be increased by .01 every half a second until your desired spin rate, and even this is a rather fast wind up. Putting larger time gaps like every second results in the “ramp-up, pause. ramp-up, pause” pattern.

This would be much simpler if the mover just had an ApproachSpinRateDuration option. When you could set it to say, 20 seconds, and then when ApproachSpinRate is set to a new speed, it takes 20 seconds to go from its current spinning speed to the new one.

2: Swing Mode (Back & Forth/Stop & Loop)

Basically, when in a loop, the mover will take the path of least resistance, meaning that if you’re looking for a back and forth swing, once it crosses the 90 degree threshold, it won’t swing back the way it came, but instead continuing on past it in the same direction.

Here’s a dumb drawing to represent what I mean over one of the park rides I’m working on.

Suggestion: Have a Swing mode where it always reverse the direction it came when reaching it’s point, even if it’s the longer distance

Honestly, surprised this has so little votes. Things like these should really be there by default with items like movers, and I say this as someone who doesn’t use movers much. It’s just a basic to have, so why would it not be there? I mean, I get it, it’s probably not the top development priority - But I do still believe it’s needed for something like this to be easily improved by at least a 1000 times. Have my vote!