I believe that "it's propably a lot harder to make than it seems/it wasn't made by a professional/for someone who just started it's good" aren't valid points when comparing things.
The website IMO looks pretty bad and basic and I am willing (more than happy, actually) to accept that. Perhaps one day I'll make a better one, perhaps not. It's still really.. meh when compared to actual sites. Telling people their creations are good for what they are (when they're not) is just sugarcoating.
Nothing personal, just wanted to express how I feel.