# "Lock" inventory items when used in a condo

**URL:** <https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/t/lock-inventory-items-when-used-in-a-condo/30328>\
**Category:** Condo Suggestions\
**Created:** [December 16, 2018, 5:17pm UTC](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/t/lock-inventory-items-when-used-in-a-condo/30328 "2018-12-16T17:17:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pinhead\_Larry](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/user_avatar/forums.pixeltailgames.com/pinhead_larry/32/33193_2.png) [@Pinhead\_Larry](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/u/Pinhead_Larry)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 5:17pm UTC](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/t/lock-inventory-items-when-used-in-a-condo/30328/1 "2018-12-16T17:17:17Z")

</div>

Basically what I’d love to see is having the game lock inventory items (or even just compartmentalize them in another spot) when they’re used in one of your condos so that you cannot sell them. I know it’s not a big deal, but on a few occasions I’ve sold items I have a few of only to find out that one of them that was placed down (and locked) in another condo got sold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![macdguy](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/user_avatar/forums.pixeltailgames.com/macdguy/32/3448_2.png) [@macdguy](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/u/macdguy)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 7:12pm UTC](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/t/lock-inventory-items-when-used-in-a-condo/30328/2 "2018-12-16T19:12:06Z")

</div>

Maybe what would be best is when you go to sell an item it warns you it’s being used in another Condo as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pinhead\_Larry](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/user_avatar/forums.pixeltailgames.com/pinhead_larry/32/33193_2.png) [@Pinhead\_Larry](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/u/Pinhead_Larry)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 8:31pm UTC](https://forums.pixeltailgames.com/t/lock-inventory-items-when-used-in-a-condo/30328/3 "2018-12-16T20:31:47Z")

</div>

Y’know somehow I didn’t think about that, but something tells me that would both be easier to implement _and_ work just as well. 😝
